Applying psychological theories to evidence-based clinical practice: identifying factors predictive of lumbar spine x-ray for low back pain in UK primary care practice
2011

Understanding Factors Influencing X-ray Referrals for Low Back Pain

Sample size: 299 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles, Nick Steen, Marie Johnston, Nigel B Pitts, Liz Glidewell, Graeme Maclennan, Ruth Thomas, Debbie Bonetti, Anne Walker

Primary Institution: Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Health Research Institute

Hypothesis

Can psychological theories predict the referral behavior of primary care physicians for lumbar spine x-rays in patients with low back pain?

Conclusion

The study shows that psychological theories can help identify factors that predict clinical behavior, although challenges in methodology remain.

Supporting Evidence

  • Psychological models can predict healthcare professional behavior.
  • Constructs from various psychological theories explained a significant proportion of variance in referral behavior.
  • Educational interventions can reduce unnecessary x-ray referrals without adverse effects.

Takeaway

Doctors often refer patients for x-rays when they have back pain, but this study found that understanding their thoughts and beliefs can help improve how they make these decisions.

Methodology

The study used a postal questionnaire survey to collect psychological measures from a random sample of primary care physicians and analyzed the data using regression models.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to low response rates and the possibility of misattribution of x-ray requests.

Limitations

The theoretical models did not fit the data well, and there were challenges in operationalizing the constructs and measuring behavior accurately.

Participant Demographics

58% of respondents were male, with a mean qualification duration of 21 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1748-5908-6-55

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication