Comparing Group Psychoeducation and Peer Support for Bipolar Disorder
Author Information
Author(s): Morriss Richard K, Lobban Fiona, Jones Steven, Riste Lisa, Peters Sarah, Roberts Christopher, Davies Linda, Mayes Debbie
Primary Institution: University of Nottingham & Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Hypothesis
Is curriculum-based group psychoeducation more clinically and cost-effective than unstructured peer group support for individuals with bipolar disorder?
Conclusion
The study aims to determine if group psychoeducation is more effective than peer support in preventing relapse in bipolar disorder.
Supporting Evidence
- Previous trials showed that structured psychoeducation increased time to relapse in bipolar patients.
- Group psychoeducation is recommended by most bipolar disorder practice guidelines.
- Evidence from Australia indicates psychoeducation reduces relapse rates compared to treatment as usual.
Takeaway
This study is trying to find out if a special group class helps people with bipolar disorder stay well better than just talking with friends who understand.
Methodology
A single blind two centre cluster randomised controlled trial comparing 21 sessions of group psychoeducation with 21 sessions of group peer support.
Limitations
The study lacks a treatment as usual group for comparison and may face challenges in recruitment and therapist experience.
Participant Demographics
Adults with bipolar 1 or 2 disorder, not in current episode but relapsed in the previous two years.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website