Feasibility of non‐anesthesiologist‐administered sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection of upper gastrointestinal tumors
2024

Sedation by Non-Anesthesiologists During Endoscopic Procedures

Sample size: 68 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ishido Kenji, Tanabe Satoshi, Kitahara Gen, Furue Yasuaki, Wada Takuya, Watanabe Akinori, Matsuda Hiromi, Okamoto Hirotsugu, Kusano Chika

Primary Institution: Kitasato University School of Medicine

Hypothesis

The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear.

Conclusion

A sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam can be feasibly administered by non-anesthesiologists.

Supporting Evidence

  • All endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures were completed successfully.
  • No severe sedation-related adverse events were reported.
  • The en-bloc resection rate was 92.2% for superficial esophageal cancer and 100% for early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma.
  • The median treatment duration was 68 minutes for superficial esophageal cancer and 84 minutes for early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma.

Takeaway

Doctors who aren't anesthesiologists can safely give patients sedation during certain procedures using a specific combination of medications.

Methodology

The study retrospectively evaluated 68 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, with sedation administered by non-anesthesiologists under supervision.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may exist due to the clinical practice perspective.

Limitations

The study was a single-center, retrospective, observational study without randomized controlled trials for comparison.

Participant Demographics

Median age was 74 years for superficial esophageal cancer and 75 years for early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma; no patients had a BMI >35 kg/m2.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.012

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/deo2.70045

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication