Stumbles, Gait, and Cognition: Risk Factors Associated with Falls in Older Adults with Subjective Memory Complaints
2024

Risk Factors for Falls in Older Adults with Memory Complaints

Sample size: 136 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Delgado Isabella, Camacho Miguel Angello, Pugliese Isabella, Clavijo Hugo Juan Camilo, Moreno Mabel, Muñoz Ospina Beatriz, Orozco Jorge

Primary Institution: Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia

Hypothesis

What are the risk factors associated with falls in older adults with subjective memory complaints or mild cognitive impairment?

Conclusion

Female sex, older age, hypertension, and a history of stumbles are significant risk factors for falls in older adults.

Supporting Evidence

  • Fallers were older (70.76 ± 7.31 years) and had more hypertension (29.63%).
  • Fallers had lower verbal fluency scores (p = 0.043) and poorer performance on the Rey–Osterrieth figure copy (p = 0.047).
  • Female sex was associated with a 3.55 times higher risk of falling (OR = 3.55, p = 0.006).
  • Hypertension increased the risk of falling by 3.33 times (OR = 3.33, p = 0.005).
  • A history of stumbles increased the risk of falling by 5.66 times (OR = 5.66, p = 0.002).

Takeaway

Older people who feel like they have memory problems are more likely to fall, especially if they are women or have high blood pressure.

Methodology

A case-control study was conducted with neuropsychological assessments and Timed Up and Go tests to analyze gait in adults over 50.

Potential Biases

Participants were selected from a neuropsychology service, which may not represent the broader population.

Limitations

The case-control design limits causal inference and the study may not generalize to all older adults.

Participant Demographics

Most participants were women (60.29%), older than 65 years, and had more than 12 years of education.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.006 for female sex, p = 0.006 for age, p = 0.005 for hypertension, p = 0.002 for stumbles

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ijerph21121683

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication