Effect of deferiprone or deferoxamine on right ventricular function in thalassemia major patients with myocardial iron overload
2011

Impact of Deferiprone vs. Deferoxamine on Right Heart Function in Thalassemia Patients

Sample size: 61 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Gillian C. Smith, Francisco Alpendurada, John Paul Carpenter, Mohammed H. Alam, Vasili Berdoukas, Markissia Karagiorga, Vasili Ladis, Antonio Piga, Athanassios Aessopos, Efstathios D. Gotsis, Mark A. Tanner, Mark A. Westwood, Renzo Galanello, Michael Roughton, Dudley J. Pennell

Primary Institution: Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Hypothesis

Deferiprone would improve RV function more than deferoxamine.

Conclusion

Deferiprone monotherapy was superior to deferoxamine for improving right ventricular function and volumes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Deferiprone reduced RV end systolic volume from 37.7 to 34.2 mL.
  • RV ejection fraction increased from 69.6% to 72.2% with deferiprone.
  • Deferoxamine showed no significant change in RVESV or RVEF.
  • Patients with lower baseline EF values showed greater improvement with deferiprone.
  • Deferiprone showed a mean effect on RVESV of -1.82 mL compared to deferoxamine.

Takeaway

This study looked at two medicines for thalassemia patients and found that one medicine, deferiprone, worked better for the heart than the other.

Methodology

Patients were randomized to receive either deferiprone or deferoxamine, and cardiac function was assessed using CMR scans at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

Potential Biases

Local blinding to treatment was not possible due to the nature of drug administration.

Limitations

The study was a retrospective analysis and did not include RV long axis images for 3D volumetric analysis.

Participant Demographics

Patients were regularly transfused thalassemia major patients from 4 centers in Greece and Italy.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.008 for RV ESV, p = 0.001 for RVEF

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.8 to 6.3%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-13-34

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication