An Exotic Species Is the Favorite Prey of a Native Enemy: A Native Enemy Prefers an Exotic Species
2011

Native Snakes Prefer Exotic Bullfrogs Over Native Anurans

Sample size: 240 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Li Yiming, Ke Zunwei, Wang Supen, Smith Geoffrey R., Liu Xuan

Primary Institution: Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Hypothesis

If the bullfrog were naïve toward the red-banded snake, the bullfrog would suffer higher predation pressures from the snake than native anuran species.

Conclusion

The study provides strong evidence that native enemies exert higher predation pressures on naïve exotic species compared to native prey.

Supporting Evidence

  • Bullfrogs showed no avoidance response to chemical cues from red-banded snakes.
  • Red-banded snakes preferred bullfrogs over native anuran species in both laboratory and field settings.
  • The proportion of bullfrogs in the snakes' diet was positively correlated with their abundance in the wild.
  • Native anurans displayed effective antipredator responses to red-banded snakes, unlike bullfrogs.

Takeaway

This study shows that when a new animal comes to a place, it might not know how to stay safe from local predators, making it easier for those predators to catch it.

Methodology

The study involved chemical detection experiments, diet preference experiments, and field surveys to assess predation pressures on bullfrogs by red-banded snakes.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the specific environmental conditions of the study area, which may not be generalizable.

Limitations

The study did not explore all potential factors influencing bullfrog invasions, such as propagule pressure and human hunting pressures.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on red-banded snakes and various anuran species, including native and exotic species.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024299

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication