Why current publication practices may distort science
2008
Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): Neal S. Young, John P. A. Ioannidis, Omar Al-Ubaydli
Hypothesis
The current system of publication in biomedical research provides a distorted view of the reality of scientific data.
Conclusion
The publication system in biomedical research leads to a misallocation of resources and a distorted understanding of scientific findings.
Supporting Evidence
- The current publication practices lead to a scarcity of negative data.
- Many published studies show formally significant results, making it hard to distinguish true findings.
- Initial clinical studies are often unrepresentative and misleading.
Takeaway
This study says that the way we publish scientific research can make it seem like we know more than we really do, which can be confusing for everyone.
Potential Biases
The publication system may favor positive results over negative ones, leading to a skewed understanding of scientific findings.
Limitations
There is a relative paucity of empirical observations on the process of scientific publication.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website