Health and function of participants in the Long Life Family Study: A comparison with other cohorts
2011

Health and Function in the Long Life Family Study

Sample size: 4559 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Anne B. Newman, Nancy W. Glynn, Christopher A. Taylor, Paola Sebastiani, Thomas T. Perls, Richard Mayeux, Kaare Christensen, Joseph M. Zmuda, Sandra Barral, Joseph H. Lee, Eleanor M. Simonsick, Jeremy D. Walston, Anatoli I. Yashin, Evan Hadley

Primary Institution: University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health

Hypothesis

Does targeting families with exceptional longevity result in better health and function among their members compared to other cohorts?

Conclusion

Participants in the Long Life Family Study exhibited better health and function compared to individuals from other cohorts.

Supporting Evidence

  • LLFS participants had lower prevalence of diabetes and chronic diseases compared to other cohorts.
  • Physical and cognitive functions were better in LLFS participants.
  • LLFS participants showed lower triglycerides and higher HDL cholesterol levels.

Takeaway

The study looked at families known for living a long time and found they were generally healthier and functioned better than others.

Methodology

The study compared health and function of 4559 individuals from the Long Life Family Study with other cohorts using various health metrics.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the exclusion of individuals with active cancer treatment and reliance on self-reported health data.

Limitations

The study's findings may be influenced by differences in protocols and potential birth cohort effects.

Participant Demographics

The cohort included probands, siblings, offspring, and spouse controls, with a mean age of 72.5 years and a majority being white.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication