Improving Pathology Reports with Synoptic Tools
Author Information
Author(s): Mohanty Sambit K, Piccoli Anthony L, Devine Lisa J, Patel Ashokkumar A, William Gross C, Winters Sharon B, Becich Michael J, Parwani Anil V
Primary Institution: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Hypothesis
Is synoptic reporting a superior method for entering and displaying pathology information?
Conclusion
Synoptic reporting enhances the accuracy and consistency of pathology reports, facilitating better cancer management.
Supporting Evidence
- The synoptic worksheets were implemented in the Laboratory Information System.
- 223 cases of various hemopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms had completed synoptic worksheets.
- Synoptic reporting reduces transcription errors and improves turnaround time.
Takeaway
This study shows that using checklists in pathology reports helps doctors get the right information faster and with fewer mistakes.
Methodology
The study developed synoptic templates for hematological and lymphoid neoplasms using WHO and CAP guidelines, implemented in a digital reporting system.
Potential Biases
Resistance to the tool among some pathologists could introduce variability in its use.
Limitations
Some pathologists found the synoptic tool cumbersome and time-consuming, which may limit its acceptance.
Participant Demographics
Pathologists at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website