Self-Interest versus Group-Interest in Antiviral Control
Author Information
Author(s): van Boven Michiel, Klinkenberg Don, Pen Ido, Weissing Franz J., Heesterbeek Hans
Primary Institution: Utrecht University
Hypothesis
What are the conditions under which a large-scale antiviral control program can prevent an epidemic?
Conclusion
The study shows that individuals may choose to take fewer antiviral drugs than is optimal for public health, especially when the risk of infection is perceived as low.
Supporting Evidence
- Antiviral drugs can be effective but may have adverse effects.
- Individuals may delay taking antiviral drugs until the risk of infection is perceived as high.
- Public health strategies may not align with individual decision-making.
Takeaway
This study looks at how people decide whether to take antiviral drugs during an outbreak and finds that many might wait too long to start taking them, which could lead to more infections.
Methodology
Population dynamical and game theoretical analyses were used to investigate antiviral control strategies.
Potential Biases
The study may not account for all factors influencing individual decisions about antiviral drug use.
Limitations
The model assumes rational behavior and perfect information, which may not reflect real-world decision-making.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website