End-User Perspectives on Social Robotics for Aging
Author Information
Author(s): Robillard Julie, Dosso Jill, Ye Haiger, Guerra Gabriella, Riminchan Anna
Primary Institution: University of British Columbia
Hypothesis
What are the perspectives of end-users on policies for social robotics in aging applications?
Conclusion
The study found that while social robots are seen as helpful, there are significant ethical considerations and misalignments with current policies.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants viewed social robots as potentially helpful assistive technologies.
- There is a need for respect for human rights and dignity in social robot policies.
- Participants recommended prioritizing cost and accessibility in policy development.
- The responsibility for policy development should lie with governments and the healthcare sector.
Takeaway
People think robots can help older adults, but we need to make sure the rules are fair and consider everyone's needs.
Methodology
Content analysis of 47 international policies and 18 semi-structured interviews.
Potential Biases
Potential biases in participant selection and responses.
Limitations
The study may not capture all perspectives as it focused on specific groups.
Participant Demographics
Participants included experts in aging and dementia as well as individuals with lived experience.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website