Diagnostic Accuracy of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal PCR Assay for Detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi during Acute Scrub Typhus Infection
2011

Testing a New Method for Diagnosing Scrub Typhus

Sample size: 161 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Daniel H. Paris, Stuart D. Blacksell, Pruksa Nawtaisong, Kemajittra Jenjaroen, Achara Teeraratkul, Wirongrong Chierakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Pacharee Kantipong, Nicholas P. J. Day, David H. Walker

Primary Institution: Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Programme, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Hypothesis

Can a loop-mediated isothermal PCR assay (LAMP) improve the diagnosis of acute scrub typhus infection compared to existing methods?

Conclusion

The LAMP assay showed similar diagnostic accuracy to conventional PCR methods and was better than antibody-based tests in early disease detection.

Supporting Evidence

  • The LAMP assay demonstrated high specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 53%.
  • Combining LAMP with antibody tests improved overall diagnostic sensitivity to 67%.
  • The study included a diverse patient demographic from a scrub typhus-endemic area.

Takeaway

Researchers tested a new, simple method to quickly diagnose scrub typhus, which is a serious illness. This method works better than some older tests, especially early on when patients first get sick.

Methodology

The study evaluated the LAMP assay in a prospective fever study involving 161 patients in a scrub typhus-endemic area, comparing results with established diagnostic criteria.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the selection of patients and the diagnostic criteria used, which could affect the perceived accuracy of the LAMP assay.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable to all populations due to the specific endemic setting and the reliance on a single diagnostic method for comparison.

Participant Demographics

The cohort included 161 patients, with 36% females and 63% males, median ages of 44 for females and 39 for males.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0004

Confidence Interval

[39–66]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pntd.0001307

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication