A retrospective cohort study of monthly rifampicin, ofloxacin and minocycline in the management of leprosy at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom
2024

Monthly Rifampicin, Ofloxacin, and Minocycline for Leprosy Treatment

Sample size: 29 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sivakumaran Priyanka, de Barros Barbara, Antonio Dias Vivianne Lopes, Lockwood Diana N., Walker Stephen L.

Primary Institution: Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Hypothesis

What are the clinical outcomes and experiences of individuals treated with monthly rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline for leprosy?

Conclusion

Monthly rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline therapy is safe, effective, and leads to improvement in skin lesions and a decline in bacterial index.

Supporting Evidence

  • 89.7% of individuals completed the monthly treatment.
  • 58.6% of individuals experienced a leprosy reaction.
  • Only one individual relapsed during the study period.
  • 49 reports of adverse effects were mild or moderate.
  • The most common adverse effect was orange discoloration of urine.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well a new leprosy treatment works, and it found that most people got better without serious side effects.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, collecting demographic and clinical data on individuals treated with mROM and their experiences through semi-structured interviews.

Potential Biases

Recall bias may affect the reliability of reported adverse effects from interviews conducted months or years after treatment.

Limitations

The small sample size and retrospective nature of the study may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

{"gender_distribution":{"male":20,"female":9},"mean_age_at_diagnosis":39,"leprosy_classification":{"tuberculoid":4,"borderline_tuberculoid":6,"borderline_lepromatous":4,"lepromatous":14,"pure_neural":1}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.04

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 0.25 to 5.9

Statistical Significance

p = 0.04

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pntd.0012699

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication