Similar NF-κB Gene Signatures in TNF-α Treated Human Endothelial Cells and Breast Tumor Biopsies
2011

NF-κB Gene Signature in Endothelial Cells and Breast Tumors

Sample size: 96 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Martine Perrot-Applanat, Sophie Vacher, Aurore Toullec, Irma Pelaez, Guillaume Velasco, Françoise Cormier, Hanan El Sheikh Saad, Rosette Lidereau, Véronique Baud, Ivan Bièche

Primary Institution: INSERM U965, Paris, France

Hypothesis

The study investigates the NF-κB gene signature in TNF-α stimulated endothelial cells and its correlation with breast tumors.

Conclusion

The study suggests that the NF-κB gene signature can be used to analyze the role of TNF-α in endothelial dysfunction and breast tumors.

Supporting Evidence

  • Twenty genes were significantly up-regulated in response to TNF-α in endothelial cells.
  • 85% of the identified endothelial TNF-induced genes showed a positive correlation with TNF in breast tumors.
  • The study identified novel TNF-α-inducible genes in endothelial cells.
  • NF-κB activation was shown to be crucial for the expression of these genes.
  • Both TNFR1 and TNFR2 were involved in the regulation of NF-κB associated genes.

Takeaway

Researchers looked at how a protein called TNF-α affects tiny blood vessel cells and found that it changes many genes, which might help us understand breast cancer better.

Methodology

The study used quantitative RT-PCR to measure mRNA expression of 55 NF-κB related genes in endothelial cells and breast tumors.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the selection of specific genes and the focus on TNF-α without considering other cytokines.

Limitations

The study primarily focuses on a specific set of genes and may not encompass all relevant factors in endothelial dysfunction and breast cancer.

Participant Demographics

The study analyzed 96 breast tumors from women, with 48 being ERα positive and 48 ERα negative.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0021589

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication