Exploring Feedback on a Nutritional Screening Mobile App
Author Information
Author(s): Mavragani Amaryllis, Payne Liz, Jones Debra MSc, Sowerbutts Anne Marie PhD, Burden Sorrel PhD
Primary Institution: School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester
Hypothesis
What are the views of healthcare professionals on the content, functionality, and usability of a newly developed mobile app for the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)?
Conclusion
The MUST app was positively evaluated by potential users, who reported it was user-friendly and an accessible way to screen for malnutrition risk.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants found the app user-friendly and accessible for screening malnutrition risk.
- The app's automatic calculation feature was highlighted as a significant improvement over paper-based tools.
- Feedback indicated that the app could enhance routine screening, especially in community settings.
- Participants suggested that the app should be tailored for professional use only, as it may be too technical for patients.
- Concerns were raised about the demographics section potentially deterring users from engaging with the app.
Takeaway
The MUST app helps doctors and nurses check if people are at risk of not getting enough food or nutrients, making it easier for them to help.
Methodology
Qualitative study using online focus groups to gather feedback from healthcare professionals about the app.
Potential Biases
Participants may have provided feedback based on their professional experiences, which could influence their views.
Limitations
The app is currently in demonstration mode and not available for direct use with patients.
Participant Demographics
Participants included dietitians, nutrition nurses, and educators with experience in using MUST.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website