Recruiting Family Caregivers for Research
Author Information
Author(s): Gustavson Allison, Griffin Joan, Horstman Molly, Kaufman Brystana, Mandrekar Jay, Vanderboom Catherine, Ingram Cory, Holland Diane
Primary Institution: Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Hypothesis
Is remote recruitment as effective as in-person recruitment for family caregivers transitioning from hospital to home?
Conclusion
Remote recruitment for family caregivers is slightly less effective than in-person recruitment.
Supporting Evidence
- In-person recruitment had a success rate of 28%.
- Remote recruitment had a success rate of 23%.
- Remote participants were more likely to be children of the care recipient.
Takeaway
This study looked at how to get family caregivers to join research. It found that meeting in person works a bit better than doing it online.
Methodology
Comparison of in-person and remote recruitment methods for family caregivers.
Limitations
The study discusses the limitations and benefits of each recruitment modality, including representativeness.
Participant Demographics
Participants were more likely to be younger, white, and have greater than high school education.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website