Profiling endogenous airway proteases and antiproteases and modeling proteolytic activation of Influenza HA using in vitro and ex vivo human airway surface liquid samples
2024

Profiling Airway Proteases and Antiproteases in Viral Activation

Sample size: 19 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Brocke Stephanie A., Reidel Boris, Ehre Camille, Rebuli Meghan E., Robinette Carole, Schichlein Kevin D., Brooks Christian A., Jaspers Ilona

Primary Institution: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America

Hypothesis

The study aims to profile extracellular proteases and antiproteases in human airway samples and assess their role in viral activation.

Conclusion

The study found significant interindividual variability in proteolytic activity towards viral peptides in airway samples, suggesting implications for susceptibility to respiratory infections.

Supporting Evidence

  • 48 proteases were detected in the apical wash of cultured human nasal epithelial cells.
  • 57 proteases were found in nasal epithelial lining fluid samples from healthy human subjects.
  • Statistically significant differences in proteolytic activity were observed between male and female smokers.

Takeaway

This study looked at how certain proteins in our airways can help viruses infect us, and found that different people have different levels of these proteins.

Methodology

The study used mass-spectrometry based proteomics to profile proteases and antiproteases in airway samples and assessed their activity using fluorogenic peptides.

Potential Biases

The study did not mention specific risks of bias.

Limitations

The study used small peptides to assess proteolytic activity, which may not fully represent the behavior of native viral proteins.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"mean":30.1,"standard_deviation":6.7},"sex":{"male":24,"female":24},"race":{"Black":16,"White":31,"Asian":1}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0419

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0306197

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication