Effects of Lung Position and PEEP on Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
Author Information
Author(s): Pavone Lucio, Albert Scott, DiRocco Joseph, Gatto Louis, Nieman Gary
Primary Institution: Upstate Medical University
Hypothesis
Does the position of the lung (dependent vs. nondependent) and the use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect the rate of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)?
Conclusion
The position of the normal lung influences the rate of VILI, with the nondependent lung being more susceptible to injury.
Supporting Evidence
- VILI occurred earliest in the nondependent lung with low PEEP.
- High PEEP prevented the development of alveolar instability in both lung positions.
- Alveolar instability was not correlated with a decrease in arterial PO2.
- The study is the first to visualize the influence of lung position on alveolar instability.
Takeaway
When using a ventilator, the part of the lung that is up gets hurt faster than the part that is down, especially if we don't use enough pressure to keep the airways open.
Methodology
Sprague-Dawley rats were mechanically ventilated in different positions and with varying levels of PEEP, and their alveolar mechanics were measured using in vivo microscopy.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the experimental model and the specific conditions under which the study was conducted.
Limitations
The study was conducted on rats, which may not fully represent human physiology.
Participant Demographics
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 330–600 g.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website