A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies
2011

Review of Retention Methods in Cohort Studies

Sample size: 28 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Booker Cara L, Harding Seeromanie, Benzeval Michaela

Primary Institution: MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK

Hypothesis

What are the effective retention strategies to increase participation in population-based cohort studies?

Conclusion

Incentives boosted retention rates in prospective cohort studies, while other methods showed some beneficial effects.

Supporting Evidence

  • Incentives were associated with an increase in retention rates.
  • Reminder letters increased retention rates by an average of 12%.
  • Face-to-face interviews increased retention rates by 24%.

Takeaway

This study looked at ways to keep people involved in long-term health studies. Giving rewards helped more people stay in the study.

Methodology

Systematic review of literature on retention strategies in population-based cohort studies.

Potential Biases

Selective attrition may limit the generalizability of findings.

Limitations

The majority of studies were conducted in the USA, which may limit generalizability.

Participant Demographics

More than half of the studies were conducted with adult cohorts, primarily in the USA.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-249

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication