Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: Data from Australia's first outbreak of equine influenza
2008

Psychological Distress During Australia's Equine Influenza Outbreak

Sample size: 2760 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Melanie R Taylor, Kingsley E Agho, Garry J Stevens, Beverley Raphael

Primary Institution: University of Western Sydney

Hypothesis

What factors influence psychological distress during a disease epidemic?

Conclusion

The study found that 34% of respondents reported high psychological distress during the equine influenza outbreak, significantly higher than the general population.

Supporting Evidence

  • 34% of respondents reported high psychological distress, compared to 12% in the general population.
  • Those in high-risk infection zones were at much greater risk of high psychological distress.
  • Younger individuals and those with lower education levels were more vulnerable to high psychological distress.
  • Respondents whose income was linked to the horse industry were more than twice as likely to report high psychological distress.

Takeaway

When a disease outbreak happened in Australia, many horse owners felt very sad and stressed, much more than usual.

Methodology

Data were collected through an online survey targeting horse owners and those in the horse industry, using the Kessler 10 Psychological Distress Scale to measure psychological distress.

Potential Biases

The sample had a higher proportion of women and individuals with higher education, which may have influenced the reported levels of psychological distress.

Limitations

The study's sample may not accurately represent all horse owners in Australia due to demographic biases and the use of an online survey.

Participant Demographics

{"gender_distribution":{"male":410,"female":2326},"age_distribution":{"under_16":36,"16-24":224,"25-34":482,"35-44":908,"45-54":771,"55-64":277,"65-74":39,"75+":3},"education_levels":{"none":65,"school_certificate":407,"HSC":394,"TAFE/Vocational":746,"university/tertiary":1109}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.57–2.55

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-347

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication