Nutrient intakes related to osteoporotic fractures in men and women – The Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS)
2009

Nutrient Intakes and Osteoporotic Fractures in Brazil

Sample size: 2344 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Pinheiro Marcelo M, Schuch Natielen J, Genaro Patrícia S, Ciconelli Rozana M, Ferraz Marcos B, Martini Lígia A

Primary Institution: Universidade Federal de São Paulo/EPM

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the association between bone health-related nutrient intake and osteoporotic fractures in individuals aged 40 and older in Brazil.

Conclusion

The study found that inadequacies in bone-related nutrient intake are prevalent in the Brazilian population, and higher phosphorus intake is associated with an increased risk of fractures.

Supporting Evidence

  • 13% of men and 15% of women reported fractures.
  • Women with fractures had significantly higher intakes of calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium.
  • Mean intakes of bone-related nutrients were below recommended levels across all socio-economic classes.
  • Every 100 mg increase in phosphorus intake was associated with a 9% increase in fracture risk.

Takeaway

Eating the right nutrients is important for strong bones, and not getting enough calcium and vitamin D can lead to more fractures.

Methodology

A transversal population-based study with 2420 individuals over 40 years old, using questionnaires and 24-hour food recalls to assess nutrient intake and fracture history.

Potential Biases

Potential recall bias in self-reported fracture history and dietary intake.

Limitations

The study relied on 24-hour recalls for dietary assessment, which may not accurately reflect usual intake, and did not measure bone mass or serum biomarkers.

Participant Demographics

Participants included men and women aged 40 and older from various socio-economic classes across Brazil.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.001

Confidence Interval

1.05–1.13

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2891-8-6

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication