Tertiary lymphoid structures in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: anatomical site matters
2024

Tertiary lymphoid structures in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: anatomical site matters

Sample size: 130 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Westbom-Fremer Sofia, Tran Lena, Ebbesson Anna, Martin de la Fuente Laura, Jönsson Jenny-Maria, Kannisto Päivi, Veerla Srinivas, Hedenfalk Ingrid

Primary Institution: Lund University

Hypothesis

The study aims to investigate the presence and composition of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) and lymphoid aggregates (LA) in primary tumors and synchronous metastases of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma.

Conclusion

The study found that mature TLS are more common in peritoneal metastases than in primary tumors, but they do not have an independent prognostic impact on overall or progression-free survival.

Supporting Evidence

  • Mature TLS were more common in peritoneal metastases than in primary tumors.
  • The presence of mTLS correlated with intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in pMets.
  • Overall mTLS cell composition was similar between primary tumors and metastases.

Takeaway

The study looked at special immune structures in ovarian cancer and found that they are more common in metastases than in the original tumors, but they don't seem to help patients live longer.

Methodology

The study used whole H&E slides and tissue microarrays to evaluate mature TLS, immature TLS, and lymphoid aggregates in a cohort of 130 cases of stage III-IV high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma.

Limitations

The study had a limited number of cases with known BRCA/homologous repair status and did not find a clear association between HRD and TLS/LA presence.

Participant Demographics

The study included consecutive cases diagnosed with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in southern Sweden between 2011 and 2015.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.0072 for mTLS presence in pMets vs PTs

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1007/s00262-024-03911-2

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication