IL2RA Genetic Heterogeneity in Multiple Sclerosis and Type 1 Diabetes Susceptibility and Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor Production
2009

IL2RA Variants in Multiple Sclerosis and Type 1 Diabetes

Sample size: 9420 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Lisa M. Maier, Christopher E. Lowe, Jason Cooper, Kate Downes, David E. Anderson, Christopher Severson, Pamela M. Clark, Brian Healy, Neil Walker, Cristin Aubin, Jorge R. Oksenberg, Stephen L. Hauser, Alistair Compston, Stephen Sawcer, Philip L. De Jager, Linda S. Wicker, John A. Todd, David A. Hafler

Primary Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School

Hypothesis

Is the autoimmunity risk at IL2RA due to distinct or shared alleles?

Conclusion

The study found allelic heterogeneity at the IL2RA region between multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, with some alleles conferring susceptibility to one disease while providing protection against the other.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study identified distinct alleles associated with susceptibility to MS and T1D.
  • Multiple variants were found to independently correlate with sIL-2RA levels.
  • The findings emphasize the need for caution when interpreting results from complex genetic regions.

Takeaway

This study looked at genes related to two diseases, multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, and found that some gene variations can make you more likely to get one disease but help protect you from the other.

Methodology

A genetic association study of three IL2RA variants was performed in a collection of healthy controls, MS, and T1D subjects.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported ethnicity and the specific populations studied.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the populations studied, and the statistical power for some SNPs was low.

Participant Demographics

Participants were primarily self-reported white individuals.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval (0.74–0.86)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pgen.1000322

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication