Deciding the fate of disputed embryos: ethical issues in the case of Natallie Evans
2007
Ethical Issues in the Case of Natallie Evans
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): Anna Smajdor
Primary Institution: Imperial College London
Hypothesis
What are the ethical implications of forcing genetic parenthood on individuals who do not wish to become parents?
Conclusion
The case highlights the need for clearer consent protocols and greater flexibility in legal definitions of parenthood in light of advancing reproductive technologies.
Supporting Evidence
- The case of Natallie Evans illustrates the complexities of genetic parenthood and consent.
- Legal frameworks have not kept pace with advancements in reproductive technology.
- Clear consent protocols are necessary to prevent disputes over embryo storage and use.
Takeaway
This study talks about a woman who fought to keep her embryos after a breakup, showing that laws about parenthood need to change as technology advances.
Limitations
The study does not provide empirical data or a specific methodology for assessing the ethical implications discussed.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website