The use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients
2007

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by Cancer Patients

Sample size: 127 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Adams Mariama, Jewell Andrew Paul

Primary Institution: St George's University of London

Hypothesis

It is unclear whether cancer patients use CAM as an alternative to standard oncology care or as an adjunct to conventional treatment.

Conclusion

CAM can contribute to improving the quality of life of cancer patients and their general well-being.

Supporting Evidence

  • Surveys show CAM use among cancer patients ranges from 7% to 64%.
  • Patients often use CAM to complement conventional therapies like chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
  • Many patients perceive CAM as a natural and harmless therapy.

Takeaway

Many cancer patients use alternative treatments alongside their regular medicine to feel better, but it's important to talk to doctors about it.

Methodology

The study reviews existing surveys and literature on CAM use among cancer patients.

Potential Biases

Patients may not disclose CAM use to healthcare professionals, leading to gaps in understanding and potential risks.

Limitations

The lack of clear definitions of CAM makes it difficult to assess its efficacy and safety.

Participant Demographics

The study indicates that most CAM users are female, married, higher earners, and better educated.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1477-7800-4-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication