SQUIRE Guidelines for Quality Improvement Reporting
Author Information
Author(s): David P Stevens, Richard Thomson
Primary Institution: Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Care
Hypothesis
How can the SQUIRE guidelines improve the reporting of healthcare improvement research?
Conclusion
The revised SQUIRE guidelines aim to enhance the clarity and accessibility of healthcare improvement research reports.
Supporting Evidence
- The SQUIRE guidelines were revised after feedback from a consensus conference.
- Over 15,000 unique viewers accessed the original draft guidelines online.
- SQUIRE aims to bridge the gap between healthcare improvement professionals and academics.
Takeaway
SQUIRE is a set of rules to help people share their healthcare improvement stories better, making it easier for others to understand and learn from them.
Methodology
The guidelines were developed through consensus among editors and improvement scholars, followed by multiple review cycles.
Potential Biases
There is a risk that the focus on improvement science may discourage reporting by those not primarily involved in this discipline.
Limitations
The guidelines may lead to longer reports and could potentially isolate the field of improvement science.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website