Using Combined Morphological, Allometric and Molecular Approaches to Identify Species of the Genus Raillietiella (Pentastomida)
2011

Identifying Species of Raillietiella Using Morphological and Molecular Methods

Sample size: 34 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Kelehear Crystal, Spratt David M., Dubey Sylvain, Brown Gregory P., Shine Richard

Primary Institution: School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney

Hypothesis

The morphological features used in pentastomid taxonomy change as the parasite transitions through different developmental stages in the definitive host.

Conclusion

The study confirms that Raillietiella frenatus can mature in both amphibians and reptiles, and emphasizes the importance of combining morphological and molecular methods for accurate species identification.

Supporting Evidence

  • Conventional analyses revealed two clusters based on hook size, suggesting two species.
  • Allometric analyses indicated that body size affects morphological traits, leading to the conclusion of a single species.
  • Molecular data showed no genetic differences between parasites from different hosts.

Takeaway

Scientists studied a type of parasite that lives in frogs and lizards to figure out how to tell different species apart, and they found that the way these parasites look can change as they grow up.

Methodology

The study used genetic analyses and both traditional and novel morphological methods to clarify the identity of pentastomids collected from various hosts.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the small number of specimens typically examined in taxonomic studies.

Limitations

The study was limited by the inability to obtain molecular data for some specimens and the reliance on preserved specimens for morphological analysis.

Participant Demographics

The study involved pentastomids collected from invasive cane toads and Asian house geckos in tropical Australia.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0002

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024936

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication