Factors Influencing Depression and Anxiety among Black Sexual Minority Men
2011

Factors Influencing Depression and Anxiety among Black Sexual Minority Men

Sample size: 54 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Graham Louis F., Aronson Robert E., Nichols Tracy, Stephens Charles F., Rhodes Scott D.

Primary Institution: University of North Carolina Greensboro

Hypothesis

The study aims to examine the relationships between depression and anxiety, ethnic and sexual identity development, and discrimination and harassment among Black sexual minority men.

Conclusion

The study found that experiences of discrimination and internalized homonegativity significantly contribute to depression and anxiety among Black sexual minority men.

Supporting Evidence

  • 30% of the sample had scale scores indicating likelihood of depression and anxiety.
  • 64% of the variance in depression scores was explained by discrimination and harassment.
  • 53% of the variance in anxiety scores was explained by discrimination and harassment.

Takeaway

This study shows that Black men who love other men often feel sad and anxious because of discrimination and negative feelings about their identity.

Methodology

An observational cross-sectional study design using self-administered online surveys and stepwise multiple regression analysis.

Potential Biases

The use of self-reported measures may introduce bias, and the sample may not represent the broader population of Black sexual minority men.

Limitations

The study used snowball sampling, which may not accurately reflect the target population, and had a small sample size that could affect the power of the results.

Participant Demographics

{"age_range":"19-50 years","mean_age":31,"education":{"high_school":12,"some_college":39,"four_year_degree":31,"terminal_degree":18},"sexual_orientation":{"homosexual":77,"bisexual":23},"religious_affiliation":{"christian":50,"spiritual":33,"none":17},"depression_diagnosis":33}

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2011/587984

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication