Understanding Shared Care in Mental Health
Author Information
Author(s): Richard Byng, Ian Norman, Sally Redfern, Roger Jones
Primary Institution: University of Plymouth
Hypothesis
How does a complex health services intervention improve shared care for people with long-term mental illness?
Conclusion
The key functions of shared care were case discussions and improved liaison during crises, which contributed to the success of the intervention.
Supporting Evidence
- Case discussions improved individual care and helped integrate link workers into primary care teams.
- The intervention catalyzed the allocation of link workers in nearly all practices.
- Facilitators provided advice and manpower to help introduce successful systems for reviewing care.
Takeaway
This study looked at how a program helped doctors and mental health workers work better together to take care of patients with long-term mental health issues.
Methodology
A retrospective qualitative interview study was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial, involving interviews with practitioners and managers.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the interviewer being involved in the development of the intervention.
Limitations
The study relied on retrospective interviews, which may introduce bias and selective recall.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 21 GPs, 8 community mental health workers, 7 practice managers, and others from 12 primary health care teams.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.003
Confidence Interval
-0.74 - -0.18
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website