On the nature and structure of epistemic injustice in the neglected tropical disease knowledge ecosystem
2024
Epistemic Injustice in Neglected Tropical Disease Research
publication
Evidence: high
Author Information
Author(s): Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Primary Institution: The George Institute for Global Health
Hypothesis
Is epistemic injustice still prevalent in the neglected tropical disease research space?
Conclusion
The study highlights that epistemic injustice continues to affect the neglected tropical disease research ecosystem, perpetuating inequalities in knowledge production and credibility.
Supporting Evidence
- The NTD research ecosystem reflects a feudal structure, with funding predominantly going to non-endemic countries.
- Local knowledge from endemic countries is often deemed less credible compared to research from non-endemic nations.
- Hermeneutical and testimonial injustices are prevalent in how knowledge is produced and valued in the NTD space.
Takeaway
Some people are not listened to when they talk about health problems because of where they come from, which is unfair. This study shows that we need to change how we think about knowledge in health research.
Potential Biases
The study discusses biases in funding and knowledge production that favor non-endemic countries over endemic ones.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website