Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Cancer Outcomes
Author Information
Author(s): Renate Pichler, Josef Fritz, Sarah Maier, Melanie R. Hassler, Johanna Krauter, David D'Andrea, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Kilian Gust, Keiichiro Mori, Karl H. Tully, Dora Niedersuess-Beke, Lea Korber, Jasmin Alija Spiegelberg, Thomas Bauernhofer, José D. Subiela, Roman Mayr, Andreas Kronbichler, Marco Moschini, Jeremy Teoh, Benjamin Pradere, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Hanno Ulmer, Laura S. Mertens
Primary Institution: Medical University of Innsbruck
Hypothesis
Does the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affect outcomes in metastatic urothelial cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors?
Conclusion
The study found that the occurrence of irAEs is not associated with better survival or improved response rates to treatment when accounting for immortal time bias.
Supporting Evidence
- The study included 335 patients with a median follow-up of 21.1 months.
- 36.4% of patients developed immune-related adverse events during the study.
- The presence of irAEs was initially associated with improved outcomes in naïve analyses but not in adjusted models.
Takeaway
This study looked at how side effects from cancer treatment can affect how well the treatment works. It found that these side effects don't actually help patients live longer or respond better to the treatment.
Methodology
The study used target trial emulation to assess the impact of irAEs on progression-free survival and overall survival in a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of metastatic urothelial cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Potential Biases
The study aimed to address immortal time bias but acknowledged that some biases may still exist.
Limitations
The study had a small number of participants receiving first-line treatment, which may affect generalizability.
Participant Demographics
The median age of participants was 69 years, with 74.6% male.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI, 0.72–1.44 for PFS; 95% CI, 0.62–1.30 for OS
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website