Identification of typical medullary breast carcinoma as a genomic sub-group of basal-like carcinomas, a heterogeneous new molecular entity
2007

Study on Medullary Breast Carcinoma and Its Genetic Features

Sample size: 59 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vincent-Salomon Anne, Gruel Nadège, Lucchesi Carlo, MacGrogan Gaëtan, Dendale Remi, Sigal-Zafrani Brigitte, Longy Michel, Raynal Virginie, Pierron Gaëlle, de Mascarel Isabelle, Taris Corinne, Stoppa-Lyonnet Dominique, Pierga Jean-Yves, Salmon Rémy, Sastre-Garau Xavier, Fourquet Alain, Delattre Olivier, de Cremoux Patricia, Aurias Alain

Primary Institution: Institut Curie

Hypothesis

The study aims to identify phenotypic and genetic alterations that distinguish medullary breast carcinomas from basal-like carcinomas.

Conclusion

Medullary breast carcinomas are part of the basal-like group but have distinct genomic alterations, including higher rates of certain genetic gains and losses.

Supporting Evidence

  • All tumors were negative for ER, PR, and ERBB2.
  • KRTs 5/6 were more frequently expressed in MBCs (94%) than in BLCs (56%).
  • TP53 mutations were found in 77% of MBCs and 83% of BLCs.
  • MBCs showed a higher number of genomic gains and losses compared to BLCs.

Takeaway

This study looks at a type of breast cancer called medullary breast carcinoma and finds that it shares some traits with other aggressive breast cancers but also has unique features.

Methodology

The study involved genetic analysis and immunophenotype assessment of 33 medullary breast carcinomas and 26 basal-like carcinomas.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the selection of cases and the retrospective review process.

Limitations

The study's findings may be limited by the small sample size and the retrospective nature of the analysis.

Participant Demographics

The median age of participants with medullary breast carcinoma was 53.5 years, while for basal-like carcinoma it was 60 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.0004

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/bcr1666

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication