Comparison of Expression Profiles in Ovarian Epithelium In Vivo and Ovarian Cancer Identifies Novel Candidate Genes Involved in Disease Pathogenesis
2011

Identifying Genes Linked to Ovarian Cancer from Normal Ovarian Epithelium

Sample size: 116 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Emmanuel Catherine, Gava Natalie, Kennedy Catherine, Balleine Rosemary L., Sharma Raghwa, Wain Gerard, Brand Alison, Hogg Russell, Etemadmoghadam Dariush, George Joshy, Birrer Michael J., Clarke Christine L., Chenevix-Trench Georgia, Bowtell David D. L., Harnett Paul R., deFazio Anna

Primary Institution: Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Hypothesis

A subset of genes involved in normal ovarian epithelial cell functions are also consistently aberrantly expressed in ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

The study identified 338 genes that are regulated during the estrous cycle and dysregulated in ovarian cancer, suggesting pathways and novel candidate genes that may contribute to ovarian cancer development.

Supporting Evidence

  • 338 genes were identified that are regulated during the estrous cycle and dysregulated in ovarian cancer.
  • Six of seven candidates selected for validation were expressed in serous ovarian cancer.
  • Most genes were overexpressed in ovarian cancer compared to normal ovarian surface epithelium.
  • Chromosome segregation emerged as an important process in which genes from the list were over-represented.
  • Lower expression of NUAK2 was associated with shorter overall survival in ovarian cancer patients.

Takeaway

Scientists looked at genes in normal ovaries and found some that are also messed up in ovarian cancer, which could help us understand how the disease starts.

Methodology

The study involved gene expression analysis of murine ovarian surface epithelium during the estrous cycle and comparison with human ovarian cancer datasets.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in gene selection due to reliance on existing datasets.

Limitations

The study primarily focused on serous ovarian cancer and may not be generalizable to other types.

Participant Demographics

Cohort 1 included 20 serous ovarian cancer samples and 10 normal ovary samples; Cohort 2 included 96 serous ovarian cancer samples.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0017617

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication