Cross‑Cultural Validation of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcomes (CRS-PRO) Questionnaire in Portuguese
2024

Validation of the CRS-PRO Questionnaire in Portuguese

Sample size: 40 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Sousa-Machado André, Cascao Mariana, Sousa Patricia, Rocha Taciano, Castanheira Antonio, Sowerby Leigh

Primary Institution: Local Health Unit of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (ULSTMAD), Vila Real, PRT

Hypothesis

To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the chronic rhinosinusitis patient-reported outcomes (CRS-PRO) questionnaire, creating a Portuguese version for evaluating patients with CRS.

Conclusion

The Portuguese version of the CRS-PRO questionnaire is a validated and well-accepted tool for assessing CRS symptoms in the Portuguese-speaking population.

Supporting Evidence

  • The questionnaire was evaluated in 40 participants who completed it on two separate occasions.
  • Twenty participants were patients with CRS, and the other twenty were healthy subjects.
  • The ICC values for the CRS with nasal polyps group ranged from 0.65 to 0.89, indicating good to excellent reliability.
  • All ICC values were statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level or lower.
  • The average time to complete the questionnaire was 1.4 minutes.

Takeaway

Researchers made a new questionnaire in Portuguese to help doctors understand how chronic sinusitis affects patients, and it works well.

Methodology

The CRS-PRO questionnaire was translated using a three-step procedure including forward translation, backward translation, and patient testing.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the medical professionals' perspectives on the clarity of technical terms.

Limitations

The main limitations include the sample size and focus on participants from a specific geographical region.

Participant Demographics

The average age of participants was 43 years, with 23 men and 20 patients with CRS (60% with polyps).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.01

Confidence Interval

0.65 to 0.89

Statistical Significance

p < 0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.74875

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication