Double-bundle ACL reconstruction: influence of femoral tunnel orientation in knee laxity analysed with a navigation system – an in-vitro biomechanical study
2008

Impact of Femoral Tunnel Orientation on ACL Reconstruction

Sample size: 6 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Stefano Zaffagnini, Danilo Bruni, Sandra Martelli, Naoaki Imakiire, Maurilio Marcacci, Alessandro Russo

Primary Institution: Laboratorio di Biomeccanica, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Hypothesis

The orientation of femoral tunnel could affect the final knee stability in double bundle ACL reconstruction.

Conclusion

Horizontal tunnel reconstruction provides better stability than vertical tunnel reconstruction in ACL surgeries.

Supporting Evidence

  • The horizontal tunnel reconstruction showed a median antero-posterior displacement of 0.8 mm less than the vertical tunnel.
  • Internal-external rotation in horizontal tunnel reconstruction was 5° less than in vertical tunnel reconstruction.
  • Both reconstructions corrected instability due to ACL rupture in antero-posterior displacements and internal-external rotations.

Takeaway

This study looked at how the angle of the tunnel used in knee surgeries affects how stable the knee is afterward. It found that a more horizontal angle is better.

Methodology

The study used six cadaver knees to compare the effects of horizontal and vertical femoral tunnel orientations on knee stability through various kinematic tests.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to the use of cadaver specimens and the lack of standard load application during tests.

Limitations

The study was limited by a small sample size and the use of cadaver specimens, which may not fully replicate in-vivo conditions.

Participant Demographics

Donors aged between 21 and 53 years old, including 2 females and 4 males.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.035

Confidence Interval

99% CI: Sup 0.028, Inf 0.042

Statistical Significance

p = 0.035

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2474-9-25

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication