Barriers to Best Practice Care for Asplenic Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Lammers A. J. Jolanda, Hoekstra Joost B. L., Speelman Peter, Lombarts Kiki M. J. M. H.
Primary Institution: Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
Hypothesis
What are the barriers preventing physicians from adhering to best practice management of asplenic patients in the Netherlands?
Conclusion
Care delivery for asplenic patients in the Netherlands is suboptimal, and better collaboration and informed patients are needed to improve quality of care.
Supporting Evidence
- Over 90% of physicians indicated that a national guideline would improve adherence to best practices.
- Physicians reported poor patient knowledge as a significant barrier to best practice.
- Many physicians expressed a lack of clarity about responsibilities in managing asplenic patients.
Takeaway
Doctors are not following the best practices for patients without a spleen, which can lead to serious infections. We need to help them work better together and educate patients.
Methodology
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Dutch physicians using questionnaires to identify barriers to guideline adherence.
Potential Biases
Physicians' self-reporting may introduce bias in the assessment of current practices.
Limitations
Response rates were modest, which could induce sampling bias, and physicians lacking knowledge may have been less likely to participate.
Participant Demographics
{"Internists":{"Number":42,"Mean_age":47,"Gender_percentage_male":71},"Surgeons":{"Number":31,"Mean_age":51,"Gender_percentage_male":93},"GPs":{"Number":47,"Mean_age":50,"Gender_percentage_male":67}}
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website