Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
2011

Immediate vs. Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception After Second Trimester Abortion

Sample size: 716 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Norman Wendy V, Kaczorowski Janusz, Soon Judith A, Brant Rollin, Bryan Stirling, Trouton Konia J, Dicus Lyda

Primary Institution: University of British Columbia

Hypothesis

Intrauterine contraception placed immediately after a second trimester abortion will result in fewer pregnancies than current recommended care of intended placement at 4 weeks post-abortion.

Conclusion

The study aims to provide evidence on whether immediate insertion of intrauterine contraception reduces subsequent unintended pregnancies compared to delayed insertion.

Supporting Evidence

  • Immediate insertion of IUC may reduce unintended pregnancies.
  • Current practice delays insertion until 4-6 weeks post-abortion.
  • Study will assess pregnancy rates at one year and over five years.

Takeaway

This study is trying to find out if putting in birth control right after an abortion helps prevent more pregnancies than waiting a month.

Methodology

Women having a second trimester abortion and choosing an IUC for post-abortion contraception will be randomized to immediate or delayed insertion.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in IUC insertion rates due to the study design and participant follow-up.

Limitations

Participants may change their intention to conceive during the study, which could affect results.

Participant Demographics

Women seeking second trimester abortions in British Columbia, Canada.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-6215-12-149

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication