A comparison of traditional anti-inflammation and anti-infection medicinal plants with current evidence from biomedical research: Results from a regional study
2010

Study of Medicinal Plants for Inflammation and Infections

Sample size: 9 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): A. Vieira

Primary Institution: Simon Fraser University

Hypothesis

Do traditional anti-inflammation and anti-infection medicinal plants have biomedical evidence supporting their use?

Conclusion

Some traditional medicinal plants warrant further investigation for their potential anti-inflammatory and anti-infection activities.

Supporting Evidence

  • 7 out of 8 anti-infection plants identified have related activities reported in biomedical research.
  • 4 out of 6 anti-inflammation plants identified have related activities reported in biomedical research.
  • The study suggests further investigation of certain plants for their medicinal properties.

Takeaway

The study looked at local plants used for treating inflammation and infections and found that many have scientific support for their use.

Methodology

Interviews with elder residents were conducted to gather information on traditional plant use, which was then compared with data from the Medline database.

Limitations

The study is limited to a specific region and may not represent broader ethnobotanical practices.

Participant Demographics

Elder residents (n = 9, 4 female and 5 male, aged 55–90 years) from villages near the northwest PNSAC border.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4103/0974-8490.72326

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication