Access to essential maternal health interventions and human rights violations among vulnerable communities in eastern Burma
2008

Access to Maternal Health Services in Eastern Burma

Sample size: 2914 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Luke C. Mullany, Catherine I. Lee, Lin Yone, Paw Palae, Oo Eh Kalu Shwe, Cynthia Maung, Thomas J. Lee, Chris Beyrer

Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Hypothesis

What is the coverage of maternal health services and the impact of human rights violations on access to these services in eastern Burma?

Conclusion

Access to essential maternal health interventions is extremely limited in eastern Burma, with significant associations between human rights violations and reduced access to care.

Supporting Evidence

  • 88% of women reported a home delivery for their last pregnancy.
  • Only 5.1% of births were attended by skilled personnel.
  • Over 60% of women had hemoglobin levels ≤ 11.0 g/dl.
  • Unmet need for contraceptives exceeded 60%.
  • 32.1% of Karenni households reported forced labor.

Takeaway

In eastern Burma, many women can't get the help they need during pregnancy and childbirth, and bad things happening to them make it even harder to get care.

Methodology

The study used two-stage cluster sampling surveys among ever-married women of reproductive age to estimate coverage of maternal health services and assess exposure to human rights violations.

Potential Biases

Potential biases include selection bias from the communities chosen for the study and unmeasured confounders affecting access to health services.

Limitations

The results may not be representative of the broader population in eastern Burma due to the selection of communities with some existing health services.

Participant Demographics

The sample included 2,914 ever-married women of reproductive age, primarily from ethnic Karen, Karenni, Mon, and Shan communities.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.95–2.40

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0050242

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication