From Where Are Tuberculosis Patients Accessing Treatment in India? Results from a Cross-Sectional Community Based Survey of 30 Districts
2011

Where Do Tuberculosis Patients in India Get Treatment?

Sample size: 609 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Satyanarayana Srinath, Nair Sreenivas Achutan, Chadha Sarabjit Singh, Shivashankar Roopa, Sharma Geetanjali, Yadav Subhash, Mohanty Subrat, Kamineni Vishnuvardhan, Wilson Nevin Charles, Harries Anthony David, Dewan Puneet Kumar

Primary Institution: International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), South-East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India

Hypothesis

What proportion of tuberculosis patients access treatment outside the Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) in India?

Conclusion

Nearly half of self-reported tuberculosis patients were missed by the TB notification system in the surveyed districts.

Supporting Evidence

  • Of the 371,174 household members, 761 TB patients were identified.
  • 331 (54%) were taking treatment under DOTS/RNTCP, while 278 (46%) were treated outside.
  • Patients accessing treatment outside were more likely to be from rural areas and diagnosed in non-government facilities.

Takeaway

The study found that many people with tuberculosis in India are not getting the help they need from the official health program, especially those living in rural areas.

Methodology

A cross-sectional community-based survey was conducted in 30 districts, identifying TB patients through door-to-door surveys and semi-structured questionnaires.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to reliance on self-reported data and incomplete clinical records for some patients.

Limitations

The study is not nationally representative and relies on self-reported data, which may miss undiagnosed cases or those unwilling to disclose their status.

Participant Demographics

64% male, 73% aged 25-54 years, 43% illiterate, 80% from households earning less than INR 4000 per month.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.021

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 42–66%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024160

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication