Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey
2007

Travel Burden for Medical Care: How Residence and Race Matter

Sample size: 2432 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Janice C Probst, Sarah B Laditka, Jong-Yi Wang, Andrew O Johnson

Primary Institution: University of South Carolina

Hypothesis

The study aims to quantify geographic and race-based differences in distance traveled and time spent in travel for medical/dental care.

Conclusion

Rural residents and African Americans experience higher travel burdens than urban residents or whites when seeking medical/dental care.

Supporting Evidence

  • Rural residents traveled an average of 17.5 miles for care compared to 8.3 miles for urban residents.
  • African Americans spent an average of 29.1 minutes traveling for care, while whites spent 20.6 minutes.
  • 7.9% of persons seeking care traveled 30 miles or more, with rural residents being four times more likely to do so than urban residents.

Takeaway

People living in rural areas and African Americans have to travel further and spend more time getting to medical care compared to those living in cities or white people.

Methodology

The study used data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, focusing on trips made for medical/dental care by analyzing distance and time spent traveling.

Potential Biases

The low response rate of 41% may not fully represent all populations, particularly minorities.

Limitations

The study's data source may oversimplify travel for care by grouping all trips as 'medical/dental' and does not account for those who avoid care due to anticipated travel burdens.

Participant Demographics

The study included a nationally representative sample of households, with a focus on rural and urban residents and various racial/ethnic groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.39–5.15 for rural travel burden, 95% CI 2.00–4.62 for African American travel burden.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-7-40

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication