Status of diabetes mellitus in different regions of KSA and update on its management
2024

Diabetes Management in Saudi Arabia: A Study of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Sample size: 638 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): AL-Rasheedi Mabrouk, Alhazmi Yasir, AlDaiji Lamees Abdullah, AlDaiji Lamya Abdullah, Mobarki Fatimah Ismail, Almuhaysini Khuzama Mohammed, Alshammari Jawza Salem, Almistadi Nouf Awadh, Yoldash Saeed Adnan, Almaqwashi Nouf, Al Abdulgader Rawabi Saleh, Mashyakhi Mohammed Yahya, Alamro Sadin, Walbi Ismail A., Haider Khawaja Husnain

Primary Institution: Various institutions across Saudi Arabia

Hypothesis

The study aims to assess the status of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in different regions of Saudi Arabia, including demographics, medications, complications, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

The study found a poor glycemic control situation in Saudi Arabia, indicating a need for stricter measures to manage diabetes and its complications.

Supporting Evidence

  • 77% of patients had uncontrolled diabetes.
  • 80% of uncontrolled blood pressure patients had uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Metformin was the most prescribed medication across all regions.
  • Retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy were the most common complications.
  • Hypertension and ASCVD were the most common comorbidities.

Takeaway

Most people with diabetes in Saudi Arabia are not managing it well, which can lead to serious health problems. We need to do better at helping them.

Methodology

An observational retrospective study was conducted using data from 638 patients' records collected from general hospitals and diabetes centers across five administrative regions in Saudi Arabia from 2017 to 2020.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and the selection of patient records.

Limitations

The study excluded patients with certain conditions, which may have influenced the findings related to cardiovascular complications.

Participant Demographics

Participants included adults aged 20 years and older, with a higher representation of those aged 40-60 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1482090

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication