Interdisciplinary Research on Rodent-Borne Diseases
Author Information
Author(s): Arpin Isabelle, Massart Clémence, Bourret Vincent, Castel Guillaume, Colombo Valeria Carolina, Eccard Jana, Firozpoor Jasmin, Grzybek Maciej, Henttonen Heikki A., Leirs Herwig, McManus Andrew, Roche Ben, Sironen Tarja, Sluydts Vincent, Stuart Peter, Zintl Annetta, Charbonnel Nathalie
Primary Institution: Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE)
Hypothesis
How can inter- and transdisciplinary research effectively address rodent-borne diseases in a polycrisis era?
Conclusion
The study found that while the project excelled in data sharing and team dynamics, it struggled with engaging societal actors throughout the research process.
Supporting Evidence
- The project achieved high scores in data sharing and team dynamics.
- Challenges were noted in engaging societal actors due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Strong leadership helped maintain team motivation during disruptions.
- Limited involvement of societal actors restricted transdisciplinary outcomes.
Takeaway
This study looked at how different experts worked together to solve problems caused by diseases spread by rodents, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methodology
The project used a semi-quantitative evaluation method called EVOLvINC to assess inter- and transdisciplinary research success.
Potential Biases
Limited prior experience with transdisciplinary research among team members may have led to misunderstandings.
Limitations
The project faced challenges in engaging societal actors and had limited resources for sociological contributions.
Participant Demographics
The team included 25 scientists from six European countries, with a mix of ecologists, epidemiologists, and sociologists.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website