Availability of healthier options in traditional and nontraditional rural fast-food outlets
2008

Healthier Fast Food Options in Rural Areas

Sample size: 205 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jennifer S Creel, Joseph R Sharkey, Alex McIntosh, Jenna Anding, J Charles Huber Jr

Primary Institution: Texas A&M Health Science Center

Hypothesis

What is the availability of healthier fast food options in traditional and nontraditional rural fast-food outlets?

Conclusion

Traditional fast food outlets offer more healthier options compared to convenience stores, but convenience stores and supermarkets provide greater access to fast food overall.

Supporting Evidence

  • Traditional fast-food outlets represented 41% of the surveyed locations.
  • Convenience stores provided 53.2% of the fast food opportunities.
  • Supermarkets offered a greater variety of regular and healthier entrĂ©es than traditional fast food outlets.

Takeaway

This study looked at where people can buy fast food in rural areas and found that while traditional fast food places have more healthy choices, convenience stores and supermarkets have more places to buy fast food.

Methodology

The study surveyed traditional and nontraditional fast-food outlets in six rural Texas counties using on-site observations.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the availability of healthier options due to lack of nutritional information on menus.

Limitations

Nutritional information was not assessed, and the study may have underestimated healthier options due to lack of menu identification.

Participant Demographics

Rural populations in six counties in Texas.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-395

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication