Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility
2006

Cost-effectiveness of IVF vs. IUI followed by IVF in couples with subfertility

Sample size: 100 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Pashayan Nora, Lyratzopoulos Georgios, Mathur Raj

Primary Institution: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge

Hypothesis

Is the primary offer of IVF more cost-effective than IUI followed by IVF for couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility?

Conclusion

Primary offer of a full IVF cycle is less costly and more cost-effective than providing IUI followed by IVF.

Supporting Evidence

  • IVF has a cost-effectiveness ratio of £12,600 per live birth-producing pregnancy.
  • Offering IUI followed by IVF increases costs significantly compared to IVF alone.
  • Six cycles of IUI followed by IVF could cost an additional £174,200 compared to IVF.

Takeaway

If couples have trouble getting pregnant, starting with IVF is cheaper and works better than trying IUI first.

Methodology

Mathematical modeling was used to estimate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of IVF versus IUI followed by IVF.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to reliance on local data and retrospective studies.

Limitations

The study relies on assumptions and estimates from local data, which may not reflect broader populations.

Participant Demographics

Couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-6-80

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication