A patient survey of out-of-hours care provided by Emergency Care Practitioners
2007

Patient Survey of Out-of-Hours Care by Emergency Care Practitioners

Sample size: 111 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Halter Mary, Marlow Tom, Mohammed Daryl, Ellison George TH

Primary Institution: Kingston University and St George's, University of London

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the care provided to patients receiving out-of-hours home visits from Emergency Care Practitioners (ECPs) in London from the patients' perspective.

Conclusion

Most patients treated at home by ECPs appeared satisfied with the care provided, but a significant minority were unclear about their assessments, which may have affected their health outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • 86.4% of patients reported being clear about their ECP's assessment.
  • 58.0% of patients reported that their health was now 'better'.
  • Only 1 patient out of 60 felt that their treatment was not 'right'.
  • Patients unclear about their assessment were more likely to seek hospital care.

Takeaway

Patients generally liked the care they got from emergency helpers who visited them at home, but some didn't understand what their helpers said, which might have made them feel worse later.

Methodology

A telephone-administered questionnaire was used to survey patients who received out-of-hours care from ECPs over a ten-week period.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported data and the exclusion of patients with dementia.

Limitations

The sample was modest and skewed towards older females, and the study relied on self-reported outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Most respondents were female (67.9%) and aged 60 or above (59.3%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.03

Statistical Significance

p = 0.03

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-227X-7-4

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication