Cancer Incidence in Men: A Study of Spatial Patterns
Author Information
Author(s): Cassetti Tiziana, La Rosa Francesco, Rossi Luca, D'Alò Daniela, Stracci Fabrizio
Primary Institution: Umbrian Population Cancer Registry, Department Medical-surgical Specialties and Public Health, Public Health Section, University of Perugia, Italy
Hypothesis
Can a two-step exploratory method effectively screen for clusters of different cancers in a population?
Conclusion
The study found that the BYM model effectively identifies geographical clusters of cancer incidence related to shared risk factors like alcohol and tobacco.
Supporting Evidence
- The BYM model produced smoother risk surfaces, enhancing the identification of cancer clusters.
- Cluster analysis revealed distinct geographical areas with high cancer risks associated with alcohol and tobacco.
- Non-smoothed SIRs were less informative for identifying cancer clusters compared to smoothed models.
Takeaway
This study looked at how different types of cancer are grouped together in certain areas, finding that places with high cancer rates often share common causes like smoking and drinking.
Methodology
The study used cancer incidence data from the Umbrian Population Cancer Registry and applied cluster analysis on standardized incidence ratios using the BYM and Poisson kriging models.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the choice of clustering techniques and the assumptions made in the models.
Limitations
The choice of clustering method may yield suboptimal results, and the study's findings require further confirmation.
Participant Demographics
The study focused on the male population of Umbria, Italy, with a total of 399,162 residents in 2001.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website