Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research
2008
Improving Health Research Reporting
Commentary
Author Information
Author(s): David Moher, Iveta Simera, Kenneth F. Schulz, John Hoey, Douglas G. Altman
Primary Institution: Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Hypothesis
Inadequate reporting of health research affects the interpretation and usefulness of study results.
Conclusion
The EQUATOR Network aims to enhance the clarity and transparency of health research reporting.
Supporting Evidence
- Inadequate reporting is a widespread issue in health research.
- Only one out of 122 trials on depression reported details about randomization.
- Empirical evidence shows that poor reporting is linked to biased treatment effect estimates.
Takeaway
This study talks about how important it is for researchers to share clear and complete information about their studies so that doctors and patients can understand the results better.
Potential Biases
Inadequate reporting can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website