Health and Liver Diagnostic Markers Influencing Glycemia in Subjects with Prediabetes: Preview Study
2024

Health and Liver Diagnostic Markers Influencing Glycemia in Prediabetes

Sample size: 2220 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Omar Ramos-Lopez, Diego Martinez-Urbistondo, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Ruixin Zhu, Maija Huttunen-Lenz, Gareth Stratton, Teodora Handjieva-Darlenska, Svetoslav Handjiev, Jouko Ensio Sundvall, Marta P. Silvestre, Elli Jalo, Kirsi H. Pietiläinen, Tanja C. Adam, Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga, Elizabeth Simpson, Ian MacDonald, Moira A. Taylor, Sally D. Poppitt, Wolfgang Schlicht, Jennie Brand-Miller, Mikael Fogelholm, Anne Raben, J. Alfredo Martinez

Primary Institution: University of Copenhagen

Hypothesis

This study aimed to analyze the interactions of glycemia with liver and health status in a prediabetic population.

Conclusion

Glycemia associations with quality of life and liver metabolism markers were evidenced, with clinical implications for diabetes and liver disease management.

Supporting Evidence

  • Quality of life was negatively affected by increased HSI values.
  • Quality of life declined more in individuals with higher glycemia and HSI scores.
  • Age and sex interactions were significant predictors of metabolic status.
  • Independent associations of liver status and quality of life with glycemia were evidenced.

Takeaway

This study looked at how blood sugar levels affect liver health and quality of life in people who are at risk of diabetes.

Methodology

The study included 2220 overweight/obese prediabetics and analyzed various health-related markers and quality of life variables using regression models.

Limitations

The study had limitations regarding the lack of exhaustive pharmacological therapies for metabolic alterations and potential confounding factors like alcohol consumption and physical exercise.

Participant Demographics

The study included overweight/obese adults with prediabetes from multiple countries.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/diagnostics14242895

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication