Postoperative Morbidity and Factors Predicting the Development of Lymphoceles Following Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study
2024

Postoperative Complications After Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer

Sample size: 183 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Mathew Joseph MS, MRCS(Ed), MCh, Kazi Mufaddal MS, MCh, Desouza Ashwin MS, MRCS(Ed), MCh, DNB, FCPS, MNAMS, Saklani Avanish MS, FRCS

Primary Institution: Department of GI Surgical Oncology and Minimal Access Surgery, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd (HCG), Bangalore, India

Hypothesis

What factors predict the development of lymphoceles following lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer?

Conclusion

Lymphoceles are the most common complication after lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer, with obesity, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, open surgery, and higher nodal yield increasing the risk of their development.

Supporting Evidence

  • 45.3% of patients developed complications post-surgery.
  • 18% of complications were clinically significant.
  • Lymphoceles were detected in 21.3% of patients.
  • Obesity was significantly associated with lymphocele development.
  • Neoadjuvant radiotherapy increased the risk of complications.
  • Open surgical approach was linked to higher lymphocele rates.
  • Higher nodal yield correlated with increased lymphocele risk.

Takeaway

After surgery for rectal cancer, some patients develop fluid-filled sacs called lymphoceles, especially if they are overweight or had radiation treatment before surgery.

Methodology

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 183 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic node dissection to assess postoperative complications.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and exclusion of patients with prior pelvic surgery.

Limitations

The study did not evaluate the impact of surgeon experience on complication rates and did not measure lymphocele volume.

Participant Demographics

{"mean_age":45.3,"gender_distribution":{"male":62.8,"female":37.2},"obesity_rate":27.9}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.094–5.695

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1245/s10434-024-16320-7

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication